MEASURED: HTC Measurement in Heat Pump Design

MEASURED: HTC Measurement in Heat Pump Design

The MEASURED project team carried out a government-funded study where the measured and BS EN12831 calculated heat loss was compared for 56 homes of different sizes, types, and ages. The calculated heat loss only matched the measurement to within its uncertainty margin for 30% of homes; this means that for 70% of homes, a heat pump would be incorrectly sized using a BS EN12831 heat loss calculation.

What was the MEASURED project?

The MEASURED project demonstrated the value of using building performance measurement in heat pump design, it was part of the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero's Heat Pump Ready Programme. The project included:

  • A field trial of more than 50 houses to compare heat pump sizing by building performance measurement, traditional survey and calculation
  • Software development to create a heat loss calculation tool suitable for easy adoption by existing Domestic Energy Assessors and which can easily incorporate building performance measurements
  • The creation of standardised measurement protocols to ensure consistent results across different building thermal performance (HTC) measurement providers

The project team brought together leading building performance measurement providers, BTS & Veritherm, and leading building energy assessment provider Elmhurst Energy Consultancy.

Why did we do it?

Building performance measurement provides accurate heat loss assessment, bespoke to individual houses. By comparison, traditional heat loss calculations based on visual surveys are prone to inaccuracy as critical factors are hard or impossible to see:

  • How much insulation in a cavity and how well installed?
  • How airtight is the building?
  • How much thermal bridging?

What were the results?

Chart showing vast differences between calculated and actual heat loss

The average absolute difference between the calculated and measured heat loss was 35%, with a range of 36% undersized to 144% oversized. There was a significant bias towards overestimating the heat loss, with 59% of houses having an overestimate which would lead in turn to an oversized heat pump. An oversized heat pump would incur higher capital costs, estimated to be 10% on average for the heat pump alone in this sample, a greater likelihood of a requirement to replace heat emitters with consequent cost and disruption, and possibly lower running efficiency over time. There were also 13% of houses for which the heat loss was undersized by a heat loss calculation; for these houses, there would be a risk that the specified heat pump wasn't sufficient to keep the house warm during the coldest periods.

What did householders & installers think?

Check out testimonials on the project YouTube page.

Where can I get any more detailed information?

Check out the project report.

MEASURED: HTC Measurement in Heat Pump Design project statistics

Facts and statistics about this research project:

field trial
65+
of homes' mis-sized by BaU heat loss calculation
70%
Cases where heat loss rate was overestimated
57%

Building performance measurement made simple

Measure the thermal performance of buildings while they are occupied and used as normal.

Temperature sensors

SmartHTC Measured Thermal Performance

A low-cost and non-invasive way of measuring the true thermal performance of a building. It requires temperature and meter data to calculate an accurate heat loss rating over a 3-week period.

Learn more about SmartHTC Measured Thermal Performance
Heat3D including FLIR ONE Pro complete kit

Heat3D Infrared U-value Measurement

Equipment to precisely measure heat flow and U-values in an hour, using a patented, quick, and non-invasive method that follows ISO9869-2.

Learn more about Heat3D Infrared U-value Measurement

Header